Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

  1. #21

    Join Date
    31 Dec 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    4

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    Being top 10 raiders of the week means nothing if you don't take in count the number of players in the alliance.
    An alliance top 10 raiders with 20 players is way more valuable than one with 60 players...

  2. #22
    Ewentualnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Nov 2013
    Location
    Who knows
    Posts
    38

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    Maybe u can do some new alliance rankings? coz situation changed a little bit
    ║▌│█│║▌║││█║▌│║▌║
    Vodka Drink Team

  3. #23

    Join Date
    20 Jun 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    348

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    i must agree, it would seem that we are in need of a new oppinion on where the alliances are streingth-wise as it seems that Cyclone (formerly ATA) have almost died out, MoQO (formerly JAG) seem to be the best contender for winning alliance and it would appear that due to recent developments that the SE really has no power, only seems to be weak half assed excuses for alliances there now.

  4. #24
    paddles's Avatar
    Join Date
    9 Feb 2010
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    691

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    Whats there to say
    NW- sim quad
    NE- Sim quad
    SE - fail quad
    SW- sim quad with a side order of fail.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    20 Jun 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    348

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    hahaha...nothing interesting then in your opinion??...what a pain...or does it just get like this every time at this stage of the game??

  6. #26
    Hermes's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Nov 2013
    Location
    Nevada, USA
    Posts
    36

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    We'll see who is really a contender when artifacts drop, I think. Who can grab them, and who can hold them.

  7. #27
    Ewentualnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Nov 2013
    Location
    Who knows
    Posts
    38

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    untill artifacts there is nothing to get excited. After them, the game begins.
    ║▌│█│║▌║││█║▌│║▌║
    Vodka Drink Team

  8. #28

    Join Date
    20 Jun 2010
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    348

    Re: Paddles's poorly thought-out alliance rankings after 10 days

    sounds like things will get exciting, i am definitely looking forward to it, my guess is that we will have a lot of people delete or be destroyed after artifacts drop

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Just a thought
    By DukeOfYorks10000 in forum Server 4 Old Archives
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 31st May 2012, 06:37 PM
  2. Whats with the out-of-whack Hero Rankings?
    By Blades in forum Bugs & Error Messages
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25th August 2011, 05:00 PM
  3. Alliance rankings
    By Soccer8642 in forum Questions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8th December 2009, 02:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •